The great Gene Krupa |
If you resist, you are a bore; a stick in the mud; a wallflower. It couldn't possibly be that you have tried dancing and find it completely uninteresting. To them, the only logical conclusion is that you need to be saved from your stuffy self.
Here's the rub: I can see why dancing is fun to people. I love music, so I can see why people want to participate in the music by moving their bodies along with it. But that is not enough for me. Why? Because I have encountered deeper fun than dancing can bring. I have played drums with other musicians. I have created the rhythm. Dancing, to me, is like eating dry crackers compared to the gourmet feast that is making music. Reacting to the rhythm is simply not as cool as controlling it -- shaping the rhythmic direction of musical expression.
The other side of rhythm |
I know how this sounds: like I am saying that I am so much superior to these dancing/gear-headed fools: "Oooh. I'm Chris, the blog philosopher. I'm so cool." But that isn't my point. In fact, I am the "dancing fool" when it comes to other things -- lots of other things. For instance:
One of my favorite meditative activities is building with wooden blocks. I do it with my sons, but, sometimes, I will even pull out the blocks when they are not around. I find it very satisfying to set the blocks on top of one another -- balancing and counter-balancing them into elaborate buildings. I suppose I am fulfilling a creative urge, but there is something about the marriage of the concrete and the creative that speaks to me. Sometimes, I even take pictures of the structures I have built.
Would an architect, who has had the deeper satisfaction of seeing his building designs come to life, be as amused by wooden blocks as I am? Probably not. He has had deeper "fun" than I have when it comes to creating edifices. I'm not going to accuse him of being a "stick-in-the-mud" because he doesn't want to build with blocks.
And when it comes to food, I am not what you would call sophisticated, despite my previous metaphor. I'm a food rube. I would never try to coax a gourmand into joining me in a McDonald's lunch; her deep appreciation, which dwarfs mine, would lead her not to want to join my silly dance. I'd have no grounds to try to make her feel guilty for not chomping into a Big Mac.
So where does this leave us? Nowhere new, I guess. But maybe we could consider that some people have found deeper fun in certain areas than we have and that not all things are fun to all people, even if they are so fun to us that we can't understand why someone else wouldn't want to participate. For me, though, it also makes me consider whether or not I am missing out on something; to consider whether someone is getting a deeper draught of the wine of life than I am. If I loved dancing, I would consider learning an instrument; I wouldn't insult the musician for not dancing.
Either way, once you sing with an orchestra, karaoke is never the same. This, I know.
And where were you when I was getting hauled off to dance by my assailants? NOWHERE!
ReplyDeleteAll I have to hang my hat on is this blog post. You should also tag this article with "too little, too late"
Oh, stop it. You simply radiate joy on the dance floor. You can't fool me, Gene Kelly. In your case, the "assailant" truly introduced you to an untapped joy.
ReplyDelete